According to a recent Deakin University study, family-friendly design guidelines for apartment buildings must be introduced in order to promote the health of the growing number of children being raised in Melbourne’s high-rise apartments.
The study, published in the journal Cities & Health, is the first to examine how the rapid increase in ‘high-rise’ parenting is impacting on Australian children’s health and development.
The most recent statists show 79,000 Australian families live in high-rise apartments – classified as dwellings more than three stories tall – an increase of 56 percent since 2011.
Lead author Dr Fiona Andrews, a senior lecturer in Deakin’s School of Health and Social Development, says the issue was these homes were typically designed for young professionals or empty nesters.
“The needs of Australian children in the planning of cities are not being properly considered,” says Andrews.
“Australia currently has no explicit child-friendly policy on high-rise, private housing, and the new Victorian Apartment Guidelines contain only one reference to children, in relation to accessibility standards.”
“Adopting explicit family-friendly design guidelines for high-rise inner-city housing, which has been done in comparable countries like Canada, is critical to improve the health and development of children raised in these types of homes,” she says.
The recent Deakin study asked 10 families, residing in apartments in the City of Yarra, to reflect on how their development and neighbourhood had a positive or negative impact on raising pre-school aged children.
The City of Yarra, a local government area in Melbourne’s inner northern suburbs, was chosen due to its growing number of high-rise dwellings – making up 37 percent of housing stock in 2016 compared to 6 percent five years earlier.
“The Australian Early Development Census also suggests a decline in child health across the City of Yarra, with 11 percent developmentally at risk children in 2012, increasing to 16 percent in 2015, which runs contrary to Victorian and Australian trends,” she said.
Negative health implications identified in the study included the safety risks of windows, balconies and carparks, along with exposure to sunlight, noise and places to play.
“Families spoke of their daily struggles with space restrictions and limited storage, as well keeping their children from disturbing neighbours or vice versa,” says Andrews.
“Others described day-to-day challenges like having limited space to dry the increased amounts of laundry that comes with young children. None of their developments included communal laundry areas and many were banned from hanging laundry on balconies.”
Andrews says the biggest issue identified was a lack of outdoor space and opportunities for active play.
“Child-friendly communal space was generally not provided in private, high-rise developments in the City of Yarra and the families we talked to felt this had negative impacts on their children,” she says.
“This is concerning because a lack of exposure to natural light has been linked with obesity in children, while apartment living, with limited access to outdoor space, also contributes to low vitamin D levels,” she says.
But some positive health impacts, like a better work/life balance due to reduction in commuting time were also identified in the study.
“High-rise apartments were seen as an important option for providing affordable housing close to parents’ city-based paid employment, letting families maintain a work and family balance they couldn’t achieve if they lived in more affordable suburban areas,” says Andrews.
“This is critical as it is estimated 10 percent of parents spend more time commuting than they do with their children each week.”
“And a parent’s long working hours can have a detrimental effect on children,” she says.
